![]() |
||
![]() |
UMC Master Plan
2001 As developed by Oslund and Associates of Minneapolis, Minnesota Presented by Joseph R. Favour and David Motzenbecker of Oslund and Associates.
Send feedback regarding Master Plan 2001 concepts to:
Note: most links are to full browser size diagrams in the .jpg or .gif format Goals & RecommendationsThese pages revisit the goals and recommendations of the 1996 Master Plan. They also address proposed changes to these goals & recommendations (noted in red). AnalysisAssets & Liabilities: This analysis diagram shows what we feel are the campus’ aesthetic assets and liabilities. The assets are colored in green, liabilities in red. Circulation: This analysis diagram focuses on pedestrian and vehicular circulation on campus. Red arrows are vehicular circulation, blue are pedestrian. This diagram also shows how both circulation types interact and where there may be potential conflicts. Districts: This analysis divides the current campus into various districts of similar uses. It allows one to see clearly what uses reside in what areas of campus. This type of analysis also helps to determine where future development will occur, and what type it may be. Edges/Gateways: This diagram highlights the campus edges – where they occur and their hierarchy. Within the edges are found multiple gateway points that allow access to campus. These also have been represented in a hierarchical manner. Expansion/Unification: This analysis shows the areas thought to be most appropriate to be expanded into and tied into the central campus, over time. Oasis of Technology: This diagram helps to make clear the notion that the heart of campus has acted, currently and historically, as an oasis of sorts. Open Space: This is a typical analysis that is done to focus the observers on what pieces of campus are purely open, either currently existing as recreation space or open grass fields. Utilities: This plan has been made to show where the current utilities are located. DiagramsThese diagrams are provided so that observers can get a sense of the basic moves that underlie each of the proposed concepts. Through the use of simple lines, arrows and shapes one can begin to see how each plan acts to shape the campus in a different manner. Existing Campus Plan: This plan simply shows the campus as it currently exists in August of 2001. 1996 Master Plan: This plan is a result of the last required revisitation of the University of Minnesota Campus Master Plans. Virtual Tour of Existing Campus Plan Master Plan Concepts The following concepts are to be seen as visionary exercises – methods in which the envelope is stretched. These are moments in which all ideals are considered. The final resulting plan will be an integrated combination of these ideas and the reality of what can truly be done.
|
|
![]() |
Round 1 - The Binary River Aerial photographs of Crookston reveal the beautiful form of the river as it carves its way through the landscape, tying far-flung places together. Our thought was to abstract the idea of the river into a central road that acts to tie the various parts of campus together. The curvilinear form would stretch west to meet the Natural History plots, moving through campus to its east edge, where the road would end in a circle that looks out over the agricultural plots. Movement of technology takes place via binary code. Ones and Zeros are the only pieces that make up the binary code – ones, being linear in nature, were perfect to act as passageways of pedestrian and vehicular movement on campus. Again, we abstracted this idea into linear tree-lined avenues of passage. We’ve added buildings and created new glass links between buildings.
|
|
![]() |
Round
1 - The
Hi-Tech/Ag Core This plan completes the loop road and adds a south mall, as well as various buildings and glass links.
|
|
![]() |
Round
1 - The
Oval Glass links are present in this scheme as well.
|
|
|
Round 2
- The
Oval/River Hybrid (presented 08-23-2001)
|
||
![]() |
Round
3 - Revision (presented 09-20-2001) After reviewing comments made during the last two sessions, in addition to comments provided by the Master Plan committee, we have adapted the previous designs into a final, singular design for the Crookston campus. This design, as in previous versions, extends the Mall loop road to the south. This move allows for ease of circulation throughout the campus interior. The road extension provides access to the new residence halls, tennis courts and a new entry road. We have responded to the comments regarding the Main Entry road confusion, particularly that of entering the new parking lot. We have addressed this issue by moving the parking lot entry road north. Access to this parking lot will now be off of the Mall road, rather than the entry. The access road will pass underneath the new link between a new Administration building and Kiehle Hall. The band of trees that seemed to separate the North and South portions of campus has been removed and an area of Arboretum-like showcase gardens has been placed near the road. This is intended to act as a draw between the different portions of campus. Also, the placement of the newly located Physical Plant buildings has been reevaluated. The new placement is much closer to County 215 than previously. The parking lots have also been revised. This revised version seems to be an excellent combination of ideals and realistic projections on what can be accomplished at the University of Minnesota, Crookston.
|
|
![]() |
Round
4 - Final Revision (Made available 10-23-2001) Final
Comprehensive Booklet Final
Large Maps 11x17" |
|
Ideas
Glass Links: The idea behind the glass links/buildings is to “reveal” technology at work. See-through spaces allow the observer outside to see activity taking place inside, whether that activity is research, students surfing the net on laptops or lectures by professors. These spaces also act to give life to campus in the evenings and during the winter, as they are lit from within, providing a warm glow apparent from the outside to anyone passing by. Binary Walls: These walls would act as sculpture, wayfinding and historical markers. They are glass walls etched, with historical information and the description of whatever building they sit in front of, in binary code. This information would be repeated in English at another inconspicuous place on the wall. The Slide: It seems that historically, students constructed a toboggan run in the center of the mall every winter…what a great activity to reinstate or recall in some form.
|
||
| People
| Technology | Your
Career | Campus Info | News | Index/Search
|
| © 2001 by the Regents of the University of
Minnesota The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer. Last Updated: Thursday, November 20, 2003 Created by UMC's Web Team. Comments to Webmaster. |